Home Apple These AirPods 2 Like Truly Wireless Earphones Feature W1 Pairing, Bluetooth 5.0,...

These AirPods 2 Like Truly Wireless Earphones Feature W1 Pairing, Bluetooth 5.0, Wireless Charging Case

Apple released the refreshed AirPods 2 half a month ago, and so far they’ve been selling like insane, regardless of their high cost of $199. Fortunately, if you want the AirPods way of life yet don’t want to spend boatloads of money, you can get some that are fundamentally the same as at a fraction of the price.

airpods

At this moment what we have here is a couple or earbuds in a wireless charging case that looks extremely similar to AirPods 2.

They clearly work simply like AirPods, as well, with the item page plotting a pairing procedure that sounds simply like the W1 and H1 chip blending process that both the first and second generation AirPods offer.

Indeed, here’s the way you pair these things:

  1. Turn on Bluetooth and WiFi on your iPhone.
  2. Bring the wireless earphones near your iPhone.
  3. Open the charging case lid and take the earphones out.
  4. Wait for a few seconds until you see a pop-up window on your iPhone with an animation showing that AirPods have been detected.
  5. Tap on ‘Connect.’
  6. You’re done and connected.

That sounds entirely amazing, isn’t that so?

What’s far better is that these feature Bluetooth 5.0 network, and even incorporates built-in Qi wireless charging simply like Apple’s own $199 version.

wireless-02

All you required for this to happen is an iOS device running iOS 12 or later, and we haven’t even gotten to the best piece yet – the price! In addition, you can save an extra 15% when checking out from here in the event that you use discount code AIR210OFF. You’ll get free shipping, as well, making for remarkable saving – particularly contrasted to Apple’s AirPods $199 pricing.

Also Read:

The reviews on these earbuds’ item page sound too encouraging, and in the event that you just can’t force yourself to spend $199 on Apple’s AirPods, why not take these for a turn instead?